Training-Free Long-Video QA Event-Level Memory 2026

MemoryCard

Topic-Aware Multi-Modal Clue Compression for Long-Video Question Answering

A reusable video-memory framework that transforms sparse, fragmented frames into semantically coherent multimodal evidence for frozen vision-language models.

21.8% maximum relative accuracy gain
Build once question-agnostic reusable memory bank
3 × 3 benchmarks × frozen VLM backbones

Self-read semantic units · High-density card rendering · Question-aware retrieval · Temporal reordering

arXiv:2606.05917

Qing Yang1 Pengcheng Huang1 Xinze Li1 Zhenghao Liu1* Yukun Yan2 Yu Gu1 Ge Yu1 Gang Li3 Maosong Sun2

1Northeastern University · 2Tsinghua University · 3Digital China Group · *Corresponding author

Abstract

From sparse frame clues to high-density multimodal memories.

Answer-relevant evidence in long videos is often sparse, brief, and temporally dispersed. Existing efficiency methods still use isolated frames or frame-derived representations as the basic clue unit. MemoryCard instead self-reads a video and its aligned utterances, segments it into semantically coherent events, generates event-level video gists, selects representative visual moments, and renders them into unified cards for retrieval and question answering.

3Long-video QA benchmarks
3Frozen answering backbones
44Cards in the default mixed-resolution budget
21.8%Maximum relative accuracy gain

Motivation

Long-video QA has an evidence-unit problem.

Retrieving the right timestamp is not enough when each retrieved clue is semantically sparse and disconnected from the event that gives it meaning.

01

Frames are fragmented

An isolated frame records an instantaneous visual state, but usually omits event boundaries, spoken content, and surrounding temporal context.

02

Critical clues are transient

Objects, actions, text, and speech may appear only momentarily, while most frames in a long video are redundant or irrelevant.

03

Reasoning needs event context

VLMs benefit from compact evidence units that bind local details to a coherent topic, speech clue, and temporal span.

Frame-centric → Event-centric

MemoryCard changes what gets retrieved.

Instead of selecting disconnected frames, the retriever selects self-contained event memories. Each card combines representative visual moments with a topic-level gist, aligned utterances, and temporal metadata.

  • Higher semantic density per visual input
  • Explicit speech and temporal grounding
  • Reusable across many questions from the same video

Method

A reusable video-memory bank in three stages.

The answering VLM remains frozen. Memory construction is question-agnostic; only retrieval and resolution allocation depend on the downstream question.

1

Self-read

Semantic unit construction

A self-read VLM segments the full video into content-aware sessions according to event, topic, and scene transitions, then aligns timestamped utterances.

2

Render

High-density Memory Cards

For each session, the model produces a topic-level gist and representative visual moments. These are rendered with speech clues and the temporal span into a unified image.

3

Retrieve & answer

Relevance-aware allocation

LongCLIP retrieves relevant cards. The top cards receive higher resolution, all selected cards are restored to temporal order, and the frozen VLM predicts the answer.

Question-agnostic constructionBuild once
Question-aware retrievalSelect per query
Mixed-resolution allocation4 high · 8 mid · 32 low
Temporal reorderingReason coherently

Experiments

Consistent improvements across backbones and benchmarks.

Select an answering backbone to compare the frozen base model with its MemoryCard-augmented variant. All values are accuracy (%).

Base model + MemoryCard Same answering model, prompt format, decoding setup, answer extraction, and evaluation protocol.
Backbone Variant Video-MME MLVU LongVideoBench
Qwen2-VL-7BBase53.756.953.5
Qwen2-VL-7B+ MemoryCard60.5 +6.865.7 +8.858.4 +4.9
Qwen3-VL-8BBase57.457.256.3
Qwen3-VL-8B+ MemoryCard64.7 +7.366.5 +9.360.1 +3.8
MiniCPM-V-4.5Base59.957.055.6
MiniCPM-V-4.5+ MemoryCard67.2 +7.369.4 +12.462.0 +6.4

Analysis

Why the representation works.

Ablations show that gains come from more than retrieval: semantic session construction, multimodal rendering, resolution allocation, and temporal organization all matter.

01

Rendering adds value beyond raw-frame retrieval

With Qwen3-VL, raw-frame retrieval reaches 60.8 on Video-MME, while the full MemoryCard representation reaches 64.7.

02

Semantic sessions outperform mechanical segmentation

Content-aware sessions better preserve coherent events than uniform-frame, fixed-length, or shot-based units.

03

Temporal order helps the answering VLM

After relevance retrieval, restoring the original chronology produces a more coherent reasoning sequence than relevance order or random order.

04

Mixed resolution balances detail and coverage

High-resolution cards preserve fine details, while low-resolution cards expand event coverage under a comparable visual-token budget.

Category-wise accuracies on Video-MME. MemoryCard is compared with Qwen3-VL-Video and Qwen3-VL across reasoning, recognition, perception, counting, OCR, and information synopsis.

Fine-Grained Task Analysis

MemoryCard improves all six task categories.

The gains are not confined to a single capability. Event-level multimodal evidence improves fine-grained perception and recognition while also strengthening OCR, information synopsis, counting, and reasoning.

+13.5 Perception points over Qwen3-VL-Video
6 / 6 Video-MME categories improved
78.0 Information synopsis accuracy

Key takeaway Memory Cards preserve local visual details while supplying the broader event context needed to interpret them. Counting and reasoning remain comparatively challenging, indicating room for denser temporal coverage and stronger cross-card aggregation.

More evidence-use analysis

Resolution allocation, temporal ordering, and top-k selection determine how the constructed Memory Cards are consumed under a constrained visual budget.

Resolution allocation. The default 4-high, 8-medium, 32-low setting achieves 64.7 on Video-MME with a visual budget only 3.3% above the eight-high-resolution reference.
Ordering and selection. Temporal ordering is strongest, while retrieval-based selection remains robust across different top-k values.

Case Study

See how MemoryCard organizes long video evidence.

Switch between the question-agnostic self-read construction view and the question-conditioned retrieval view.

Retrieve → allocate → reorder

Question-conditioned visual evidence

The retriever ranks cards from the reusable memory bank, then organizes them into 4 high-resolution, 8 medium-resolution, and 32 low-resolution inputs. Answer-critical details receive more pixels without sacrificing broad temporal coverage.

Resources & Citation

Reproduce, extend, and cite MemoryCard.

The project page is fully static and the paper code is publicly available. Update the citation entry if a proceedings version becomes available.

BibTeX
@article{yang2026memorycard,
  title   = {MemoryCard: Topic-Aware Multi-Modal Clue
             Compression for Long-Video Question Answering},
  author  = {Yang, Qing and Huang, Pengcheng and Li, Xinze
             and Liu, Zhenghao and Yan, Yukun and Gu, Yu
             and Yu, Ge and Li, Gang and Sun, Maosong},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.05917},
  year    = {2026}
}
Expanded paper figure
BibTeX copied